Quillify, next to everything else you might buy
Everything else in this table is a database you operate. You still decide what to chase, track what is due, remember what this funder wants and what you promised them last time, and write the thing yourself. Quillify holds all of that and does the work: it finds what you qualify for, drafts from your own documents, and keeps the calendar. That is the difference between software you run and software that runs the job.
The coverage is the widest here as well, grants through contracts to lenders, and it is the smaller half of the argument. Every price and claim below was read off that vendor’s own live pages and dated, so you can check any line in two minutes.
All competitor figures verified 6 August 2026. The whole field in one table, including the tools we are not usually compared with.
At a glance
| Vendor | Entry price | Free tier | In one line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quillify | $0, plans from $99/mo | Permanent | Does the work rather than storing it: finds what you qualify for, drafts from your own documents, keeps the calendar. Across grants, contracts, foundations, lenders and the nonprofit registry. |
| Instrumentl | $299/month billed annually, $349 monthly | None. 14-day trial, no card. | Discovery, writing and post-award management for established nonprofit development teams. |
| Grantable | $0, paid from $50/month | Permanent, with every capability, gated on usage, not on features | The closest competitor on positioning. AI-first discovery and writing, with a permanent free tier and no per-seat fees. |
| Candid | $219/month | None | Research infrastructure, not a workflow tool. The largest funder dataset in the sector by a wide margin. |
| GrantWatch | $22/week, or $249/year | Basic search filters | The price anchor. A human-verified listing service with a token-metered AI writer, at a fraction of everyone else's price. |
| Granted AI | $29/month | Yes, no card required | Full-lifecycle positioning at a low price point, aimed at federal and research grants. |
| GrantCopilot | $24/month, or $216/year | None. 7-day trial | The lowest monthly price of anything in this category that writes, with funder-specific templates. |
| FundRobin | £39.20/month | No subscription free tier | UK-founded, and the one tool in this category built for organizations outside the United States. |
| Grantboost | $32/month | Trial | Positioned close to us on find-and-write, at the low end of the market. |
| Grant Assistant | Not published | None published | Demo-led and enterprise-shaped, with the strongest specific outcome claims in the category. |
| GrantHub | $99/month for GrantHub Pro, until it closed | None, and no longer relevant | A grant tracking tool for small teams, closed by Foundant on 31 January 2026, with users pointed at Instrumentl. |
| GrantStation | $219/quarter, about $83/month billed annually | None. Bundled through some association memberships | A research subscription with a training and community layer attached, rather than a writing tool. |
| Submittable | Not published | None | Grantmaking software, sold to the organizations giving money away rather than to the ones applying. |
The shape of this market
It is barbelled: a cluster of cheap drafting tools under $50 a month, the incumbents at $219 to $999, and almost nothing between. Quillify sits exactly in that gap at $99, with a permanent free tier underneath it that nothing above $50 on this page offers.
The structural difference is coverage. Almost everyone here indexes grants and stops. We carry 11,000+ open federal and state contract opportunities and 480+ community lenders alongside 4,000+ open grants, and for companies, cities and tribal enterprises those are frequently the larger and more winnable money.
The comparisons
Quillify vs Instrumentl
Discovery, writing and post-award management for established nonprofit development teams.
Quillify vs Grantable
The closest competitor on positioning. AI-first discovery and writing, with a permanent free tier and no per-seat fees.
Quillify vs Candid
Research infrastructure, not a workflow tool. The largest funder dataset in the sector by a wide margin.
Quillify vs GrantWatch
The price anchor. A human-verified listing service with a token-metered AI writer, at a fraction of everyone else's price.
Quillify vs Granted AI
Full-lifecycle positioning at a low price point, aimed at federal and research grants.
Quillify vs GrantCopilot
The lowest monthly price of anything in this category that writes, with funder-specific templates.
Quillify vs FundRobin
UK-founded, and the one tool in this category built for organizations outside the United States.
Quillify vs Grantboost
Positioned close to us on find-and-write, at the low end of the market.
Quillify vs Grant Assistant
Demo-led and enterprise-shaped, with the strongest specific outcome claims in the category.
Quillify vs GrantHub
A grant tracking tool for small teams, closed by Foundant on 31 January 2026, with users pointed at Instrumentl.
Quillify vs GrantStation
A research subscription with a training and community layer attached, rather than a writing tool.
Quillify vs Submittable
Grantmaking software, sold to the organizations giving money away rather than to the ones applying.
One name you will not find here
OpenGrants now leads with AI strategy consulting rather than grant software, so we read them as having left the category. Everyone still in it is in the table above, including the grantmaking side of the market: the two industries called grant software explains which half you are actually shopping in.
The cheapest way to compare is to use the free one.
Browsing and keyword search are free, and there is no card required.