Skip to content
Quillify

See it early enough to do something about it

Most funding is not lost to a bad proposal. It is lost to finding out too late, to a requirement nobody saw until Thursday, and to a deadline that arrived while you were doing your actual job.

What Quillify watches so you do not have to

A calendar of what is actually due
Everything you are tracking, by week, with the deadline on it. Add an opportunity to your calendar straight from the card you found it on, before you have decided anything else about it. The point is that the decision to skip something is a decision you make, rather than one a missed date makes for you.
Monitoring that runs while you do other work
Describe what you are looking for once and Quillify keeps watching for new opportunities that match. New matches arrive as they are published rather than when you next remember to search, which is the difference between a pipeline and a scramble.
Requirements known up front, not in the last 72 hours
Every proposal carries a compliance checklist: each requirement, where it is addressed, the risk of missing it, and its own deadline. Rows can be assigned to teammates. The column that decides whether you can realistically apply is the one listing what your team must produce itself, and you see it at the start rather than the night before.
A record of what you applied for and what happened
Applied, won, lost, pending, per opportunity. Unglamorous, and it is the thing that turns a year of scattered effort into something you can show a board.
Policy updates, in plain language
Funder and agency announcements matched to your organization type, refreshed daily, each with a one-line note on why it matters to you. Major changes are flagged: policy or funding shifts that affect many programs at once. A new data-sharing rule, an agency joining a program, a deadline moving on something you are tracking. The changes that quietly decide eligibility reach you the day they land.
The Funding Calendar in week view, showing 13 to 19 September. Tuesday the 15th carries two submission deadlines, each marked with a red dot and labeled with the funder.
The Funding Calendar, week view. Deadlines you are tracking, with the funder on each. Captured from a demo organization, not a customer account.

Flagged as Major recently

Straight from the feed, so you can judge the feature by what it actually caught. Subscribers get the full stream matched to their organization type; these are the newest changes big enough to affect many programs at once.

  • NIH ยท August 27, 2026

    Request for Information: Draft NIH Policy on Sharing Summary Level Study Results with Clinical Research Participants

    NIH is seeking feedback on a proposed policy requiring researchers to share summary study results with clinical trial participants.

As of August 31, 2026, refreshed daily.

Lead time is the whole feature

Speed gets marketed and lead time gets bought. If your organization needs a council vote, a tribal government approval, a board sign-off, or a partner letter from someone who is on holiday, then a proposal you can write in an afternoon is still useless if you found the opportunity nine days before it closed.

That is why monitoring and the calendar matter more to some of our customers than the writer does. Knowing about something six weeks out is what makes the internal process possible at all. Speed is only worth what your approval chain lets you spend it on.

What watching costs

Monitoring is roughly a credit a week per active watch, and the product shows you that figure in the product, next to the switch, before you turn it on. A tracked opportunity on your calendar costs about four credits a month.

Small numbers, printed exactly. Every action has a published price.

Where the loop hands back to you

It does not submit for you. Federal and state portals want a human with credentials, and handing that over to software would be a worse idea than it sounds.

It does not manage the money after you win. Drawdowns, reimbursement requests, spend against budget, indirect cost, match and subawards are all somebody else's software. Awards tracks the dates an award letter creates, not the money it moves. Here is the loop we do cover.

Winning is when the deadlines start

A grant you win arrives with a schedule attached: financial reports, progress reports, a final report, a closeout window, records you have to keep for years, and a list of changes you need the funder's permission to make first. All of it lives in the award letter, and most of it is discovered late.

Hand the letter over once and Quillify reads it out: the reporting schedule including the recurring ones, the closeout window, how long records have to be kept, the changes that need prior approval, and any program income the award creates. Every obligation lands on the same calendar your deadlines already use, and each one shows the sentence from the letter it came from, so you can check the extraction rather than trust it.

Where the letter is silent, the federal rules are not, and Quillify says which is which: a closeout date derived from the regulation is labelled as coming from the regulation. When the funder amends the award, the modification is read over the top and the fields that changed are marked, with the previous terms kept.

Lead time works here the way it works everywhere else on this page. Tell Quillify how long your own approvals take and every date shifts to when the work has to start. A report due in thirty days is a report needing a board signature in fifteen.

Stop finding out on the Thursday.

Browsing and keyword search are free, and there is no card required.